The Board cited C03-02 where it dismissed the complaint based on its holding that the courts have primary jurisdiction to interpret the public records act.  In addition, the Board noted that there is no statute or legislative policy that makes confidential the e mail address of a citizen who sends an e mail, or is cc'd on an e mail, received by a legislator.  On the substantive issue of whether the content of the e-mail may be viewed as a use of public resources in opposition to a pending ballot measure, the Board concluded the e mail's incidential references to that measure were in the context of political debate that was occurring in the Legislature, permissible under either (2)(c) or (2)(d) of RCW 42.52.180.  Complaint dismissed for lack of reasonable cause.