Test 1
|
Test 2
|
Test 3
Legislature Home
|
Senate
|
House of Representatives
|
Contact Us
|
Search
|
Help
|
Mobile
2005
Quick Launch
Audit & Study Reports
JLARC Reports
Corrections/Judiciary
Economic Development/Natural Resources
Education
Human Services
Labor/Workforce Development
State/Local Government
Transportation
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
Meetings
Members
About JLARC
About I-900
Reports & Public Hearings
About Tax Preferences
Contact JLARC
Inside the Legislature
Find Your Legislator
Visiting the Legislature
Agendas, Schedules and Calendars
Bill Information
Laws and Agency Rules
Legislative Committees
Legislative Agencies
Legislative Information Center
E-mail Notifications
Civic Education
History of the State Legislature
Outside the Legislature
Congress - the Other Washington
TVW
Washington Courts
OFM Fiscal Note Website
Legislature Home
>
Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee
>
Audit & Study Reports
>
2005
>
05-18
Print Version
|
No disponible en Español
Title
At-Risk Youth Study
Report Type
Final Report
Date Published
November 2005
Publication Number
05-18
Mandate
C 285 L 03
Online Availability
View this publication in Acrobat PDF format
Requires version 4.0 or later of
Adobe Acrobat Reader Software
Report PowerPoint Presentation
Abstract
In 2003, the Legislature directed JLARC to identify programs currently operated by local jurisdictions in Washington that have: proven effective at preserving families or reducing youth crime; and produced cost savings, or were cost neutral, to the state budget. JLARC was also asked to evaluate options encouraging local investment in such programs. JLARC conducted a survey of local jurisdictions to identity locally-implemented programs addressing child welfare or juvenile crime. An interim report focused on local investment incentives and identified two possible incentive mechanisms. The study found that programs addressing child welfare or juvenile crime that are cost-effective and that are not cost-effective have been locally implemented. The study also found that efforts to encourage local spending on proven cost-effective programs are underway. The study’s one recommendation is that the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) should provide an annual report to the fiscal committees of the Legislature, itemizing the amount of DSHS spending on prevention and early intervention programs that the Washington State Institute for Public Policy has determined are either not cost-effective or for which a cost-benefit estimate cannot be made on the basis of current research.
Author(s)
Cynthia L. Forland
, Analyst
Ruta Fanning
, Project Manager
Print Availability
Request hard copy from the
JLARC Publications Officer
Number of Pages
Keywords
Category
Human Services